554bd09968
label offset computation still has a bug
...
I changed the test a little to make it obvious.
Basically there's no way we can compute the segment offset correctly
without knowing the segment name in the previous assertion.
2019-07-11 21:38:25 -07:00
be995e2193
revert compute-offsets to segment-relative offsets
...
The pseudocode was a mess here :/ I was saving the segment-offset but
tracing the file-offset.
Segments need file offsets (to tweak their starting address).
Labels need segment offsets (to add to segment starting address).
2019-07-11 21:31:00 -07:00
f57a458e7b
.
2019-07-11 21:24:09 -07:00
3a3e7a90d7
move discard instruction to correct spot
2019-07-11 22:31:56 -04:00
2805308785
updated test so 'x' is relative to file-offset not segment offset
2019-07-11 22:21:32 -04:00
c2725b65b3
made test 2 pass
2019-07-11 22:13:03 -04:00
538f24c296
.
2019-07-10 11:57:08 -07:00
c5f7d9dd57
.
...
I think we're calling the wrong variant here.
2019-07-10 11:38:24 -07:00
304bce5895
start distinguishing table lookups from inserts
2019-07-10 11:32:46 -07:00
84aa2fad2d
.
...
Fix infinite loop in the 2 remaining failing tests; now it's a segfault.
2019-07-10 09:39:38 -07:00
7e9cdf3c7a
.
2019-07-10 09:35:24 -07:00
48aabc860a
mostly done with emit-output
...
Some nooks and crannies will need light final debugging with xxd, but
emit-hex-output covers most of the logic.
2019-07-09 23:41:32 -07:00
20a527702b
done with emit-segments
...
Only failures now are the first two tests in survey.subx.
2019-07-09 22:11:44 -07:00
7bc9240c3c
.
2019-07-09 17:50:22 -07:00
4a739023d9
.
2019-07-09 17:41:52 -07:00
c7564b7688
.
2019-07-09 16:55:57 -07:00
b14457a4cb
.
2019-07-09 16:55:57 -07:00
5821a0f612
clean up after a few calls
2019-07-09 16:55:55 -07:00
f6ea25613f
preserve truthiness of non-booleans
...
Everywhere we check if something is true, we check it by comparing
against 0, not 1.
2019-07-09 16:55:37 -07:00
7a752f8d3d
this looks like a bug
...
But of course the test is still infinite-looping so we can't be sure.
I'm still just reading the code.
2019-07-09 16:55:13 -07:00
ca32bfbed8
.
2019-07-09 16:54:48 -07:00
d6c6aebef4
.
2019-07-09 16:37:01 -07:00
ba93234603
move 'segment-start' to a global variable as well
...
It's ugly to have function locals in global variables, but we'll figure
out later how to deal with it.
2019-07-09 16:32:06 -07:00
eb4b45db40
.
2019-07-09 16:27:48 -07:00
dc7066c7bf
there's a variant of compute-width for slices
...
Looks like the original compute-width is now dead. But still seems
useful to have around.
2019-07-09 16:25:31 -07:00
acc83b644b
there's a variant of get-or-insert for slices
...
The compute-offsets test now goes into an infinite loop :( But I figure
all these changes are useful anyway, we should just debug the error
separately.
2019-07-09 16:23:14 -07:00
b8b92251e9
keep labels definitions on a separate line
...
SubX in SubX doesn't support mixing labels with other stuff :)
2019-07-09 16:02:00 -07:00
7761194ec1
switch to global Heap
2019-07-09 16:00:55 -07:00
476049a09d
.
...
Be more consistent about names of ends of a slice.
(In the opposite direction compared to last night's 925fc490d2ce8b8d411de87bd0af5b3a8a704213.)
2019-07-08 17:02:09 -07:00
b5da792904
.
...
minor style tweaks
2019-07-08 16:43:35 -07:00
01b45300ed
colocate compute-offsets with its globals
2019-07-08 16:38:32 -07:00
925fc490d2
.
...
Be more consistent about names of ends of a slice.
2019-07-08 01:05:23 -07:00
597ce7a943
.
2019-07-08 00:17:42 -07:00
195d62f167
build `num-bytes`
2019-07-07 23:56:23 -07:00
c38b36e260
move `is-label?` to `subx-common`
2019-07-07 22:49:04 -07:00
c0a904382b
made first compute-offset test pass
2019-07-07 21:19:50 -04:00
c17643b7a8
remove segfaults in survey.subx
2019-07-07 19:41:26 -04:00
fb8474af88
new failing test: emit-segments
...
Now the only piece I plan to not write tests for is emit-headers.
2019-07-07 13:19:51 -07:00
633c289f30
.
2019-07-07 13:13:38 -07:00
764b5726df
move phase 3 out of helpers
2019-07-07 13:13:38 -07:00
b95060262e
cleanup in compute-offset and fix bug in compute-width
2019-07-07 15:39:35 -04:00
9ac5834194
more progress in compute-offset
2019-07-04 22:59:15 -04:00
f80a025e52
implement segment section in compute-offsets
2019-07-04 12:21:41 -04:00
c015791e80
.
...
Fix a couple of syntax errors.
survey.subx still failing tests.
2019-07-04 00:02:53 -07:00
d818fdd7e5
add todo for section thats not quite complete
2019-07-03 23:04:24 -04:00
98096ca81e
add is-label block
2019-07-03 23:02:14 -04:00
87ef858628
updates to survey - part of compute-offsets implemented
2019-07-03 22:39:47 -04:00
34cf8a7034
subx/survey: now computing label addresses
2019-07-02 14:24:44 -07:00
7895d0a480
.
...
subx/survey/compute-addresses: Now computing segment starting addresses
correctly.
2019-07-02 13:45:48 -07:00
9d5ba2dfbf
.
2019-07-02 00:16:23 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
nc