Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kartik Agaram
4524da2bb6 4718 2018-10-24 15:52:41 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
b6fdd2e4e5 4717 2018-10-24 00:01:00 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
d27812594a 4715 - support one more negation instruction 2018-10-23 23:19:55 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
0f851e48aa 4695 2018-10-14 00:00:39 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
06d9b1a541 4694
Check for duplicate docstrings.
2018-10-13 23:55:07 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
dc559a00c7 4693
Add the standard mnemonic for each opcode.

We aren't ever going to have complete docs of the subset of the x86 ISA
we support, so we need to help readers cross-correlate with the complete
docs.
2018-10-13 23:50:10 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
6fc975ebcf 4689 2018-10-12 23:45:41 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
222c31db21 4688 2018-10-12 23:41:43 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
01dada15c3 4687 2018-10-12 23:27:26 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
544fbdc6e2 4686 2018-10-12 23:15:34 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
88b478087e 4685 2018-10-12 23:13:15 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
ca00f6b97c 4634 2018-10-01 11:09:07 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
7d4e351a0d 4503
Include LEA (load effective address) in the SubX subset of x86 ISA.
2018-09-22 23:19:39 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
d47f3a8278 4584 - discrepancy between SubX and native x86
One of the more painful things I had to debug with machine code. Tricks
I used can be seen in ex10.subx:
- printing argv[1] in various places
- printing a single 'X' in various places to count how many times we get
  to different instructions
- exiting with the current value of EAX in various places

I repeatedly went down the wrong trail in several ways:
- forgetting that the problem lay in native runs, and accidentally switching
  to subx runs during debugging.
- forgetting to pass commandline args, because ex10 doesn't check its argv
- writing the wrong comment for an instruction, and then miscalculating
  the set of registers that need to be saved.
- forgetting that syscalls clobber EAX.

Debugging native runs is hard, because you have to write non-trivial code
to instrument the binary, and instrumentation can itself be buggy.

When we finally tracked it down, I recognized the problem immediately.
I'd meant to confirm the behavior of opcode 8a against bare metal, and
then forgot.
In any case, opcode 8a was inconsistent with 88. Sloppy.
2018-09-21 22:25:00 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
45967d2106 4578 - subx: implement inc/dec operations 2018-09-21 16:03:31 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
0a7b03727a 4547 2018-09-16 22:02:31 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
1a62e61df4 4538 2018-09-07 22:20:29 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
e07a3f2886 4537
Streamline the factorial function; we don't need to save a stack variable
into a register before operating on it. All instructions can take a stack
variable directly.

In the process we found two bugs:

a) Opcode f7 was not implemented correctly. It was internally consistent
but I'd never validated it against a natively running program. Turns out
it encodes multiple instructions, not just 'not'.

b) The way we look up imm32 operands was sometimes reading them before
disp8/disp32 operands.
2018-09-07 22:19:13 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
f1b3d7b967 4527 - reading commandline arguments
The new example ex9 doesn't yet work natively.

In the process I've emulated the kernel's role in providing args, implemented
a couple of instructions acting on 8-bit operands (useful for ASCII string
operations), and begun the start of the standard library (ascii_length
is the same as strlen).

At the level of SubX we're just only going to support ASCII.
2018-08-30 01:15:45 -07:00
Kartik Agaram
a066ad7ed7 4469 2018-08-03 23:42:37 -07:00