akkartik
/
mu
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
mu/subx/apps
History
Kartik Agaram 8188bbbc94 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 
Considering how much trouble a merge phase would be (commit 4978), it seems
simpler to just add the extra syntax for controlling the entry point of
the generated ELF binary.

But I wouldn't have noticed this if I hadn't taken the time to write out
the commit messages of 4976 and 4978.

Even if we happened to already have linked list primitives built, this
may still be a good idea considering that I'm saving quite a lot of code
in duplicated entrypoints.
 		2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
..
Readme.md 4533 2018-09-01 20:40:54 -07:00
crenshaw2-1 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
crenshaw2-1.subx 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
crenshaw2-1b 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
crenshaw2-1b.subx 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
factorial 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
factorial.subx 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
handle 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
handle.subx 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
hex 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
hex.subx 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
pack 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00
pack.subx 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases 2019-02-18 21:48:19 -08:00

Readme.md

Larger programs than in the subx/examples/ subdirectory, combining the techniques demonstrated there.