clarify implications for the `require` keyword
This commit is contained in:
parent
4dffcacc3a
commit
fe9708fd29
|
@ -69,6 +69,11 @@ them in Teliva and let people use regular Lua. Or other platforms!
|
|||
they have access to a (color, UTF-8) text-mode window for printing text to,
|
||||
and a keyboard for reading unbuffered keystrokes from.
|
||||
|
||||
- Teliva doesn't use files, so the `require` keyword no longer makes sense.
|
||||
You get some libraries preloaded (see below). Beyond those, apps should
|
||||
include all Lua code they want to use. There's no affordance for adding
|
||||
native (non-Lua) libraries.
|
||||
|
||||
- I want to provide sandboxed access to system resources (file system,
|
||||
network, etc.) which will likely create incompatibilities with the standard
|
||||
library. I'm disinclined to try to ‘improve’ on Lua syntax,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue