left_adjoint
/
miscellaneous-docs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

more lettering

This commit is contained in:
clarissa 2023-05-26 20:13:03 -07:00
parent 19ec01baa3
commit 97b9499d30
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
newsletter6.org
View File

@ -51,7 +51,11 @@ Now consider, what if out of that two hundred only 10 of them are cheaters? Then
So the efficacy of a tool like zerogpt is almost entirely dependent on whether you think that cheating is prevelant---but even in the best case scenario you will be punishing students who are not cheating!
Consider, then,
I feel comfortable saying, then, that trying to detect whether students are using LLMs with any kind of automated tool is probably useless.
So what of cheaters? I don't know. I'm still not entirely convinced that we need to worry about it for most classes. Here's part of my reason: we already know that payments to "paper mills" has gone way down since chatGPT became available. See this article: https://restofworld.org/2023/chatgpt-taking-kenya-ghostwriters-jobs/
This tells me that the people using chatGPT to cheat were already turning in work that wasn't their own. I think it's kind of a wash and we don't need to upend our teaching and make assessment more inaccessible.