lucidiot/rsrsss
lucidiot
/
rsrsss
2
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Activity

Post about sfeed

This commit is contained in:
~lucidiot 2022-01-09 22:33:12 +01:00
parent 8526694882
commit 43916df482
1 changed files with 17 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
feed.xml
View File

@ -618,5 +618,22 @@
<p>It's always great to see someone other than me show some interest in feeds, especially to the point of creating new feeds. This service might not have the most well written Python code, or might break easily should any of those websites choose to change something, but it has the merit of existing and of being a reminder that feeds do exist and that some people want them. Just that alone gives me warm fuzzies.</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>sfeed</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2022 22:31:53 +0100</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">sfeed-parser</guid>
<category domain="https://envs.net/~lucidiot/rsrsss/">Tool</category>
<link>https://codemadness.org/sfeed-simple-feed-parser.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>~elioat made me discover <a href="https://codemadness.org/sfeed-simple-feed-parser.html" target="_blank">sfeed</a>, a tool that parses RSS and Atom feeds and can generate a list of items in multiple formats, including a static HTML page, a <a href="twtxt.readthedocs.org/en/stable/" target="_blank">twtxt</a> feed, or an Atom feed. This is what it looks like on Eli's own setup:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://txt.eli.li/pb/rss/feeds.html" target="_blank">HTML view</a></li>
<li><a href="https://txt.eli.li/pb/rss/exported-feeds.opml" target="_blank">An OPML export of all the subscriptions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://txt.eli.li/pb/rss/feeds.atom" target="_blank">An Atom feed combining every subscription</a></li>
<li><a href="http://txt.eli.li/pb/rss/feeds.txt" target="_blank">A twtxt feed combining every subscription</a></li>
</ul>
<p>While the Atom feed feels a little crude to me, a constant abuser of XML namespaces inside of feeds, I like the idea of what is basically a static site generator whose content comes from feeds. Static sites always feel much more manageable to me, be it as a developer, as a server administrator, or as an archivist. I do have an archivist side, with how much I've been using the Internet Archive in all my projects.</p>
]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>