130 lines
3.1 KiB
TeX
130 lines
3.1 KiB
TeX
% vim: spell spelllang=en_us
|
|
|
|
% enable useful warnings about various things
|
|
\RequirePackage[l2tabu,orthodox]{nag}
|
|
% fixes for various LaTeX2e kernel bugs
|
|
\RequirePackage{fixltx2e}
|
|
|
|
% explicit paper size (same default), larger font (default 10pt)
|
|
\documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]{article}
|
|
|
|
% replace the main font (default Computer Modern)
|
|
\usepackage{fourier}
|
|
|
|
% lots and lots of additional math-related commands
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
|
|
|
% make the title bold
|
|
\title{\textbf{A Fancier Article on Some Topic}}
|
|
% explicit line-break, typewriter font for email address,
|
|
% more authors
|
|
\author{Peter H.\ Fr{\"o}hlich\\
|
|
\texttt{phf@cs.jhu.edu}
|
|
\and
|
|
Someone E.\ Entirely\\
|
|
\texttt{someone@example.net}
|
|
\and
|
|
Can Never Recall\\
|
|
\texttt{recall@what.org}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\maketitle
|
|
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
Oh the wonders of \LaTeX!
|
|
As you can see a lot of the layout is completely
|
|
automatic and moderately boring.
|
|
But that's sort of the point.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\section{Introduction}
|
|
|
|
Where you introduce the topic you want to rant
|
|
about for the next few pages.
|
|
And of course you can cite things like
|
|
% citations by keyword, see below, need to run
|
|
% twice to resolve properly
|
|
\cite{lamport94} or \cite{kant02} if you feel
|
|
like it.
|
|
|
|
\section{Methodology}
|
|
|
|
Where you describe the approach you took and
|
|
% footnote, note no space between word and command
|
|
attempt to justify\footnote{Check this out,
|
|
you can slap a footnote basically anywhere
|
|
and it'll actually come out alright. Well,
|
|
sorta anyway.} why it's valid.
|
|
|
|
\section{Results}
|
|
|
|
Where you give the results of your experiments
|
|
and explain away any anomalies that might be
|
|
embarrassing.
|
|
|
|
\section{Related Work}
|
|
|
|
Where you describe work that others have done
|
|
and either praise it or rip it to shreds.
|
|
|
|
\section{Conclusions}
|
|
|
|
Where you tell people that don't read the rest
|
|
what it all means; presumably also where you
|
|
state that more research is definitely needed.
|
|
|
|
\appendix
|
|
|
|
\section{Appendix}
|
|
|
|
Where you say whatever you couldn't say earlier
|
|
in the paper for some reason.
|
|
% here's some math since you've heard that TeX
|
|
% is good at that kind of stuff
|
|
There are silly formulas like \(a^2 + b^2 = c^2\) I
|
|
guess, but that's not nearly cool enough. So let's
|
|
try this instead:
|
|
\[
|
|
\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}
|
|
= 1 - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} - \cdots
|
|
= \ln 2
|
|
\]
|
|
Not too shabby! And because I am sure that
|
|
\emph{someone} is taking Linear Algebra right
|
|
now:
|
|
\[
|
|
A_{m,n} =
|
|
\begin{pmatrix}
|
|
a_{1,1} & a_{1,2} & \cdots & a_{1,n}\\
|
|
a_{2,1} & a_{2,2} & \cdots & a_{2,n}\\
|
|
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\
|
|
a_{m,1} & a_{m,2} & \cdots & a_{m,n}
|
|
\end{pmatrix}
|
|
\]
|
|
Doing this in regular \LaTeX{} would be a bit harder,
|
|
but with \AmS-\LaTeX{} it's no problem whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
% define entries of the bibliography, this is the
|
|
% silly way of doing bibliographies though...
|
|
\begin{thebibliography}{9}
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{kant02}
|
|
Immanuel Kant,
|
|
\emph{Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics
|
|
That Can Qualify as a Science}.
|
|
Translated by Paul Carus.
|
|
Open Court Publishing Company, Illinois,
|
|
1902.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{lamport94}
|
|
Leslie Lamport,
|
|
\emph{\LaTeX: A Document Preparation System}.
|
|
Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts,
|
|
2nd edition,
|
|
1994.
|
|
|
|
\end{thebibliography}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|