6f65b65f7d
7290
...
I've wrestled for a long time with how to support integer division with
its hard-coded registers. The answer's always been staring me in the face:
just turn it into a function! We already expect function outputs to go
to hard-coded registers.
2020-11-27 21:37:20 -08:00
704265bd3c
7289
2020-11-27 12:39:18 -08:00
3341af3d92
7288
2020-11-27 00:26:27 -08:00
530af63477
7287
...
Regression: I'd broken compare on bytes. Apparently I took away support
for bytes from numberlike-output even though I didn't need to by the end.
2020-11-27 00:17:51 -08:00
125bfde435
7286 - mu.subx: isolate bytes from previous values
2020-11-27 00:04:54 -08:00
c165b0be5a
7285
2020-11-26 23:20:15 -08:00
736bfe9547
7284
2020-11-26 22:34:32 -08:00
b0dfe182ff
7283
2020-11-26 21:59:28 -08:00
7f40e8a3f6
7282
2020-11-26 21:46:46 -08:00
896a353a7d
7281
2020-11-26 21:37:09 -08:00
066014d4b4
7280
2020-11-26 21:23:15 -08:00
5ce7c8dcff
7279
2020-11-26 20:10:46 -08:00
e9f411d5c5
7278 - typo in mu.subx
2020-11-26 12:58:02 -08:00
7cfd2b36a1
7277
2020-11-26 12:01:25 -08:00
fac93a64bd
7276
2020-11-26 11:36:29 -08:00
d041165d0f
7275
2020-11-26 11:18:24 -08:00
6173a84f35
7274
...
Fix a bug in whole integer support. And we'll forget about compressing
large integers into scientific notation for now.
2020-11-25 23:35:51 -08:00
c6446c1f3d
7273
...
A wishlist of passing tests.
Let's see how the naive algorithm at http://www.ryanjuckett.com/programming/printing-floating-point-numbers
does.
2020-11-25 23:08:15 -08:00
3ff2e99c0b
7272 - snapshot: printing floats in decimal
...
I've made some progress to where I can print whole integers right. But
this whole approach of mixing decimals with binary exponents is going to
be super confusing. I need to bite the bullet and just use decimal exponents.
2020-11-25 23:01:17 -08:00
b4932228ca
7271
2020-11-25 21:03:52 -08:00
dbb5df2790
7270
2020-11-21 22:04:15 -08:00
32505d159e
7269
2020-11-21 21:40:23 -08:00
e786968a9c
7268
2020-11-20 17:08:01 -08:00
fd4d7b38da
7267 - mu.subx: type-check 'convert' statements
2020-11-20 00:20:58 -08:00
729800593a
7266
2020-11-17 22:05:45 -08:00
396a7ef691
7265
2020-11-17 19:06:19 -08:00
fc83d26766
7264
2020-11-17 19:03:55 -08:00
10bf5a0986
7263
2020-11-17 18:47:38 -08:00
de8a15e9f0
7262
2020-11-17 18:24:38 -08:00
1696ed831a
7261 - mu.subx: array bounds-checking done
2020-11-17 18:16:26 -08:00
83221b4e21
7260
...
This seems to preserve the intent of commit 6555.
2020-11-17 16:32:38 -08:00
1eb1cade71
7259
2020-11-17 13:12:36 -08:00
98399a621f
7258
2020-11-17 10:04:53 -08:00
18944f44e6
7257 - partially undo commit 7253
...
I don't need to pass the function pointer quite so low. I think..
2020-11-17 10:04:49 -08:00
789c0ac05a
7256
2020-11-17 09:25:17 -08:00
e3349a169c
7255
2020-11-17 08:20:27 -08:00
78d2754276
7254
2020-11-17 01:06:43 -08:00
18579f77c6
7253 - mu.subx: starting to bounds-check 'index'
...
First step: start passing the function name into code-generation functions.
We're going to need it for the error message.
2020-11-16 22:32:25 -08:00
dd60a1d73c
7252
2020-11-16 20:44:02 -08:00
3d31467c0d
7251
2020-11-16 00:37:37 -08:00
8d2dece291
7250
2020-11-16 00:00:32 -08:00
264aba4d92
7249
2020-11-15 23:23:05 -08:00
002f2609e9
7248 - mu.subx: new primitive 'clear-object'
2020-11-15 23:13:23 -08:00
2715d377b6
7247
2020-11-15 22:54:56 -08:00
b6b94712a1
7246 - tile: segment each function's area
2020-11-15 22:05:33 -08:00
bdbf2093ea
7245 - tile: right-align functions
2020-11-15 21:45:20 -08:00
7ca4b6a2f7
7244 - tile: new layout for primitives
2020-11-15 21:01:17 -08:00
56ed1a1073
7243 - tile: starting to make functions editable
2020-11-15 20:30:01 -08:00
a8dfb603fd
7242
2020-11-15 20:24:41 -08:00
0879555213
7241 - mu.subx: check float registers
2020-11-15 17:24:38 -08:00
Kartik Agaram