Mu: a human-scale computer

Mu is a minimal-dependency hobbyist computing stack (everything above the processor and OS kernel).

Mu is not designed to operate in large clusters providing services for millions of people. Mu is designed for you, to run one computer. (Or a few.) Running the code you want to run, and nothing else.

$ git clone https://github.com/akkartik/mu
$ cd mu
$ ./translate_mu apps/ex2.mu  # emit a.elf
$ ./a.elf  # adds 3 and 4
$ echo $?
7

Rather than start from some syntax and introduce layers of translation to implement it, Mu starts from the processor's instruction set and tries to get to some safe and clear syntax with as few layers of translation as possible. The emphasis is on internal consistency at any point in time rather than compatibility with the past. (More details.)

Currently Mu requires a 32-bit x86 processor and Linux kernel.

Goals

In priority order:

• Reward curiosity.
  • Easy to build, easy to run. Minimal dependencies, so that installation is always painless.
  • All design decisions comprehensible to a single individual. (On demand.)
  • All design decisions comprehensible without needing to talk to anyone. (I always love talking to you, but I try hard to make myself redundant.)
  • A globally comprehensible codebase rather than locally clean code.
  • Clear error messages over expressive syntax.
• Safe.
  • Thorough test coverage. If you break something you should immediately see an error message. If you can manually test for something you should be able to write an automated test for it.
  • Memory leaks over memory corruption.
• Teach the computer bottom-up.

Non-goals

• Speed. Staying close to machine code should naturally keep Mu fast enough.
• Efficiency. Controlling the number of abstractions should naturally keep Mu using far less than the gigabytes of memory modern computers have.
• Portability. Mu will run on any computer as long as it's x86. I will enthusiastically contribute to support for other processors -- in separate forks. Readers shouldn't have to think about processors they don't have.
• Compatibility. The goal is to get off mainstream stacks, not to perpetuate them. Sometimes the right long-term solution is to bump the major version number.
• Syntax. Mu code is meant to be comprehended by running, not just reading. For now it's a thin veneer over machine code. I'm working on memory safety before expressive syntax.

Toolchain

The Mu stack consists of:

• the Mu type-safe language;
• SubX, an unsafe notation for a subset of x86 machine code; and
• bare SubX, a more rudimentary form of SubX without certain syntax sugar.

All Mu programs get translated through these layers into tiny zero-dependency ELF binaries. The translators for most levels are built out of lower levels. The translator from Mu to SubX is written in SubX, and the translator from SubX to bare SubX is built in bare SubX.

Mu programs can be run in emulated mode to emit traces, which permit time-travel debugging. (More details.)

incomplete tools

The Mu translator is still a work in progress; not all incorrect programs result in good error messages.

Once generated, ELF binaries can be packaged up with a Linux kernel into a bootable disk image:

$ ./translate_mu apps/ex2.mu  # emit a.elf
# dependencies
$ sudo apt install build-essential flex bison wget libelf-dev libssl-dev xorriso
$ tools/iso/linux a.elf
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 256M -cdrom mu_linux.iso -boot d

The disk image also runs on any cloud server that supports custom images.

Mu also runs on the minimal hobbyist OS Soso. (Requires graphics and sudo access. Currently doesn't work on a cloud server.)

$ ./translate_mu apps/ex2.mu  # emit a.elf
# dependencies
$ sudo apt install build-essential util-linux nasm xorriso  # maybe also dosfstools and mtools
$ tools/iso/soso a.elf  # requires sudo
$ qemu-system-i386 -cdrom mu_soso.iso

Syntax

The entire stack shares certain properties and conventions. Programs consist of functions and functions consist of statements, each performing a single operation. Operands to statements are always variables or constants. You can't say a + b*c, you have to break it up into two operations. Variables can live in memory or in registers. Registers must be explicitly specified. There are some shared lexical rules; comments always start with '#', and numbers are always written in hex.

Here's an example program in Mu:

More details on Mu syntax →

Here's an example program in SubX:

== code
Entry:
  # ebx = 1
  bb/copy-to-ebx  1/imm32
  # increment ebx
  43/increment-ebx
  # exit(ebx)
  e8/call  syscall_exit/disp32

More details on SubX syntax →

Forks

Forks of Mu are encouraged. If you don't like something about this repo, feel free to make a fork. If you show it to me, I'll link to it here, so others can use it. I might even pull your changes into this repo!

• mu-normie: with a more standard build system that organizes the repo by header files and compilation units. Stays in sync with this repo.
• mu-x86_64: experimental fork for 64-bit x86 in collaboration with Max Bernstein. It's brought up a few concrete open problems that I don't have good solutions for yet.
• uCISC: a 16-bit processor being designed from scratch by Robert Butler and programmed with a SubX-like syntax.
• subv: experimental SubX-like syntax by Sol Bekic for the RISC-V instruction set.

Desiderata

If you're still reading, here are some more things to check out:

• The references on Mu and SubX syntax, and also bare SubX without any syntax sugar.

• How to get your text editor set up for Mu and SubX programs.

• Some tips for debugging SubX programs.

• Shared vocabulary of data types and functions shared by Mu programs. Mu programs can transparently call low-level functions written in SubX.

• A summary of how the Mu compiler translates instructions to SubX. (colorized version)

• Some starter exercises for learning SubX (labelled hello). Feel free to ping me with any questions.

• Commandline reference for the bootstrap C++ program.

• The list of x86 opcodes supported in SubX: ./bootstrap help opcodes.

• Some details on the unconventional organization of this project.

• Previous prototypes: mu0, mu1.

Credits

Mu builds on many ideas that have come before, especially:

• Peter Naur for articulating the paramount problem of programming: communicating a codebase to others;
• Christopher Alexander and Richard Gabriel for the intellectual tools for reasoning about the higher order design of a codebase;
• David Parnas and others for highlighting the value of separating concerns and stepwise refinement;
• The folklore of debugging by print and the trace facility in many Lisp systems;
• Automated tests for showing the value of developing programs inside an elaborate harness;
• Minimal Linux Live for teaching how to create a bootable disk image.
• “Bootstrapping a compiler from nothing” by Edmund Grumley-Evans.
• “Creating tiny ELF executables” by Brian Raiter.
• StoneKnifeForth by Kragen Sitaker.